東吳大學教師授課計劃表

檔案產生時間：2022/3/4 下午 08:03:04
本表如有異動，於4小時內自動更新
一、課程基本資料 Course Information
科目名稱 Course Title：
(中文)轉型正義專題
(英文)A SEMINAR ON TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE		 開課學期 Semester：110學年度第2學期
開課班級 Class：哲碩一
授課教師 Instructor：陳瑤華 CHEN, JAU-HWA
科目代碼 Course Code：MPH84201 單全學期 Semester/Year：單 分組組別 Section：
人數限制 Class Size： 必選修別 Required/Elective：選 學分數 Credit(s)：3
星期節次 Day/Session： 一567　 前次異動時間 Time Last Edited：111年02月22日14時18分
哲學系(碩士班)基本能力指標 Basic Ability Index
編號
Code		 指標名稱
Basic Ability Index		 本科目對應之指標
Correspondent Index		 達成該項基本能力之考評方式
Methods Of Evaluating This Ability
1邏輯論証與批判思考
Proficiency in logical and critical thinking.		●》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》外文閱讀
2道德推理與倫理實踐
Ability to make good moral reasoning and being well-disposed to put morality into practice.		●》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》外文閱讀
3發展自我與終極關懷
Developing one’s self and proper sensitivity to and concern with ultimate issues in human’s life.		  
4社會與多元文化關懷
Being sensitive to social problems and to issues related to multi-cultures.		  
5哲學應用與創意思考
Good at applying philosophy to practical matters and to creative endeavors.		●》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
6哲學史觀與哲學主題詮釋
Both historically well-informed and interpretatively competent with respective to issues or topics in philosophy.		  
7表達與論述
Good communicative and argumentative skills.		●》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
二、指定教科書及參考資料 Textbooks and Reference
(請修課同學遵守智慧財產權，不得非法影印)
●指定教科書 Required Texts
1. Arthur, Paige, (2009), “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice” in Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 321-367.
2. Sisson, J. (2010), “A Conceptual Framework for Dealing with the Past”, in Politorbis, Nr. 50-3/2010, 11-16. (http://www.dplf.org/sites/default/files/1292518783.pdf )
3. Mendez, Juan E. (1997), “Accountability for Past Abuses”, Human Rights Quarterly, 19: 255–282.
4. 陳俊宏（2015）:〈聯合國處理轉型正義原則〉，收錄於：《記憶與遺忘的鬥爭》，台北：衛城出版社，143-160。
5. Crowe, David M. (2014), War Crime, Genocide, and Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-282. (Ch. 6紐倫堡軍事審判，Ch. 7 東京軍事審判)
6. Huhler, Rainer(2011), "Coming to terms with 'Crime Against Humanity' In Nuremberg and Beyond", in Human Rights and History, Berlin: Stiftung "Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft, 62-81.
7. Crenzel, Emilio, "From judicial truth to historical knowledge: The disappearance of persons in Argentina", in: African Yearbook of Rhetoric, 2012 vol. 3 p. 53 – 64.
(http://www.africanrhetoric.org/pdf/09_AYOR%203,2%20Crenzel.pdf )
8. Gonzalez Morales, F. (2012), “The progressive development of the international law of transitional justice: the role of the Inter-American system”, in: Almqvist, Jessica; Esposito, Carlos, The Role of Courts in Transitional Justice, London/NY, 31-55.
9. Roth-Arriaza(2015), "After Amnesties are Gone", Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 37, No.2 (2015), 341-382.
10. Rettig, Max (2008), “Gacaca: Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Post-conflict Rwanda?” African Studies Review 51, 3: 25-50.
11. Hayner, Priscilla B. (2006) “Truth commissions: a schematic overview”, in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol, 88 No 862, pp. 295-310.
12. Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
13. Amnesty International (2010), Commissioning justice Truth commissions and criminal justice, in: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL30/004/2010
14. Ferstman, Carla (2010), “Reparation As Prevention: Considering the law and practice of orders for cessation and guarantees of non-repetition in torture cases”, in: Preventing Torture in the 21st Century: Monitoring In Europe Two Decades On, Monitoring Globally Two Years On, 2010 Special Issue of the Essex Human Rights Review [http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V6N2/Ferstman.pdf]
15. Satz, D. (2012), “Counting the Wrongs of the Past: The role of Compensation”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 129-150.
16. Grodsky, B.K. (2010), The Cost of Justice, Norte Dame: University of Norte Dame, 58-74.
17. David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17-43.
18. Human Rights Watch (1996), Shattered Lives: Sexual violence During the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath, New York: Human Rights Watch.
19. Buckley-Zistel, S. and Zolko, M. (2011), “Introduction in Transitional Justice”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Macmillan, 1-36.
20. Grud, K. and Manjoo, R. (2010), “Challenging Hegemonic Understanding of Human Rights Violations in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: The Need for a New Narrative”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 76-95.
21. Keaney-Mischel, C. (2010), “A Gender Approach for Policy in UN Peacekeeping Mission”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 96-115.
22. 陳俊宏（2015）〈檢視台灣轉型正義之路〉，《新世紀文教論壇》，臺北：新世紀文教基金會，請見：http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/71/71-05.pdf
23. 高誠晚（2019）台灣與韓國轉型正義之比較，收入：民主、文化與認同，翁聖峰、蘇瑞鏘主編，台北：國立臺北教育大學，46-83.
24. Sup Han
Source (2005), Kwangju and beyond: Coping with past State Atrocities in South Korea, In Sup Han
Source: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Aug., 2005), 998-1045.
25. Kim Jong-min ( 2018), Seventy Years after the Jeju April 3, In The Jeju 4.3 Mass Killing, Ed. By Jeju 4.3 Peace Foundation, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 115-152.
26. Yang Jeong-sim (2018), The Jeju 4.3, Memories of Massacre and Times of Uprising, In The Jeju 4.3 Mass Killing, Ed. By Jeju 4.3 Peace Foundation, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 153-178.
27. Mun Goong-su (2018), Discussion over the Jeju 4.3 Incident in the Public Sphere, In The Jeju 4.3 Mass Killing, Ed. By Jeju 4.3 Peace Foundation, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 201-234.
28. Hun Joon Kim (2012), Local, National, and International Determinants of Truth Commission: The South Korean Experience,In Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3 (August 2012), 726-750




●參考書資料暨網路資源 Reference Books and Online Resources
1. Naomi Roht-Arriaza (2006) “The new landscape of transitional justice”, in: Transitional Justice in 21. Century, Cambridge & Malden: Polity, 1-16.
2. Teitel, Ruti (2003), “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, in Harvard human rights journal Harvard human rights journal, Vol. 16, No. spring, 69-94.
3. Webber, J. (2012), “Forms of Transitional Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 98-128.
4. Report of the UN Secretary General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies (S/2004/616), p. 9. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement
5. General Assembly. 2006. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. A/RES/60/147. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/496/42/PDF/N0549642.pdf?OpenElement
6. Linton, Suzannah (ed, 2013), Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Priemel, Kim C. and Stiller, A. (ed. 2012), Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
8. Huhle, Rainer, (Ed.) (2007), From Nuremberg to The Hague, booklet and itinerary exposition on behalf of the German Ministry of Foreign Relations, Nuremberg, in: http://www.von-nuernberg-nach-den-haag.de/en/
9. Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 151-172.
10. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on prosecutorial prioritization strategies in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/27/56, 2014.
11. Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 128-150.
12. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods and responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/24/42, 2013.
13. Leebaw, B. (2011), Judging State-Sponsored violence: Imagining Political Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119-144.
14. Vernule, A. (2012), “Reparations as Rough Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 151-165.
15. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the General Assembly on reparations for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law. A/69/518, 2014.
16. United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 60/147, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147 (2005), 16 December 2005, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.
17. David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 44-92.
18. Mageza-Barthel (2011), “Asserting their Presence! Women Quest for Transitional Justice in Post-Genocide Rwandan”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 163-190.
19. Chappel, L. (2011), The Role of ICC in Transitional Gender Justice: Capacity and Limitation”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Macmillan, 37-58.
20. 白色恐怖受難者口述歷史：國家人權博物館：http://www.nhrm.gov.tw/movielist?uid=927
21. Su-Hoon Lee (1993), Transitional Politics of Korea, 1987-1992: Activation of Civil Society, In Pacific Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), 351-367
22. Jennifer Lind (2011), Democratization and Stability in East Asia,In International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2 (June 2011), 409-436.
23. Hun Joon Kim (2012), Structural determinants of human rights prosecutions after democratic transition In Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 49, No. 2 (march 2012), 305-320.
24. Elin Skaar (1999), Truth Commissions, Trials: Or Nothing? Policy Options in Democratic Transitions, In Third World Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 6 (Dec., 1999), 1109-1128.
三、教學目標 Objectives
這門課主要介紹轉型正義的理論，包括全球轉型工程、實踐、反思及規範。課程主要探討以下問題：
什麼是轉型的正義？
為什麼會以「轉型」及「正義」兩個概念來命名「該如何處理及反思過去政權的人權侵害」？
轉型正義的工程及形式有哪些？
各國轉型正義的實踐有哪些？
對轉型正義的時間有哪些批評性的反思？
聯合國有何相關轉型正義的準則和規範？
為什麼轉型正義必須關注性別及原住民的議題？
臺灣的轉型正義有哪些問題？
南韓與台灣轉型正義各有何共同及特殊之處？
藉由這些問題的討論來釐清：正義、人權、可咎責性、真相、有罪不罰、和解、賠償、性暴力等概念在轉型正義方面的應用與修正。
This seminar will introduce the theories of transitional justice, including global transitional justice mechanisms, practices, critical reflections and norms. Following questions are matter for the seminar:
What is "transitional justice"?
Why the two terms, "transitional" and "justice" are combined to address atrocities and mass human rights violations of the past regimes?
What are forms or practices of transitional justice?
What are norms and critical judgments of the practices?
Why gender and indigenous issues relevant to transitional justice?
What are problems of Taiwan's seeking justice for the 228 Incident and White Terror?
What are common and specific features of transitional justice in South Korea and Taiwan?
Following concepts will be clarified regarding transitional justice readings and discussions: justice, human rights, accountability, truth, impunity, reconciliation, compensation.
四、課程內容 Course Description
●整體敘述 Overall Description
本課以「誰是加害者？」為研究的核心，探討貫穿轉型正義政治工程中，加害者的多元面貌，包括涉及審判、真相委員會、賠償、除垢或清洗、制度改革等探討中所呈現的加害者、加害組織、人權侵害模式及如何究責等問題。台灣轉型正義工程最少觸及加害者及其責任問題，對加害者概念的複雜度、組織性的加害模式及不同層次責任問題缺乏深入的探討。

"Who are the perpetrators?" is the leading question of this seminar. The multiple faces of perpetrators in trial, truth commission, reparation, lustration and institutional reform studies would be the target of the investigation, including their representations, systems and institutions, models of human rights violation, and how their responsibilities should be addressed. Taiwan's transitional justice engineering focuses rarely on the perpetrators and their responsibilities. The complexities of perpetrator's concept, the systematic violation of human rights by the state, and the distinctive responsibilities are less investigated.
●分週敘述 Weekly Schedule
週次 Wk 日期 Date 課程內容 Content 備註 Note

1

 2/21 課程主題討論
  　

2

 2/28 放假





  　

3

 3/7 主題一： 什麼是「轉型正義」？
Arthur, Paige, (2009), “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice” in Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 321-367.
參考資料：
Naomi Roht-Arriaza (2006) “The new landscape of transitional justice”, in: Transitional Justice in 21. Century, Cambridge & Malden: Polity, 1-16.
Teitel, Ruti (2003), “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, in Harvard human rights journal Harvard human rights journal, Vol. 16, No. spring, 69-94.

 　

4

 3/14 主題一： 什麼是「轉型正義」？
Sisson, J. (2010), A Conceptual Framework for Dealing with the Past, in Politorbis, Nr. 50-3/2010, 11-16. (http://www.dplf.org/sites/default/files/1292518783.pdf )
Mendez, Juan E. (1997), “Accountability for Past Abuses”, Human Rights Quarterly
19: 255–282.
陳俊宏（2015）:聯合國處理轉型正義原則，收錄於：記憶與遺忘的鬥爭，台北：衛城出版社，143-160。
參考資料：
Webber, J. (2012), “Forms of Transitional Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 98-128.
Report of the UN Secretary General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies (S/2004/616), p. 9. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement
General Assembly. 2006. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. A/RES/60/147. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/496/42/PDF/N0549642.pdf?OpenElement
  　

5

 3/21 主題二：加害者與審判
Crowe, David M. (2014), War Crime, Genocide, and Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-282. (Ch. 6紐倫堡軍事審判，Ch. 7 東京軍事審判，以及Ch. 8亞洲軍事審判)
參考資料：
Linton, Suzannah (ed, 2013), Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priemel, Kim C. and Stiller, A. (ed. 2012), Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, New York and Oxford: Berghahn.		  　

6

 3/28 主題二：加害者與審判
Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 30-103.
Huhler, Rainer(2011), "Coming to terms with 'Crime Against Humanity' In Nuremberg and Beyond", in Human Rights and History, Berlin: Stiftung "Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft, 62-81.
參考資料
Huhle, Rainer, (Ed.) (2007), From Nuremberg to The Hague, booklet and itinerary exposition on behalf of the German Ministry of Foreign Relations, Nuremberg, in: http://www.von-nuernberg-nach-den-haag.de/en/
  　

7

 4/4 放假  　

8

 4/11 主題二：加害者與審判
Roth-Arriaza(2015), "After Amnesties are Gone", Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 37, No.2 (2015), 341-382.
Rettig, Max (2008), “Gacaca: Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Post-conflict Rwanda?” African Studies Review 51, 3: 25-50.
參考資料：
Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 151-172.
Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on prosecutorial prioritization strategies in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/27/56, 2014.

 準備學期報告主題

9

 4/18 主題三、加害者與真相委員會
Hayner, Priscilla B. (2006) “Truth commissions: a schematic overview”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol, 88 No 862, pp. 295-310.
Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 7-26.
Amnesty International (2010), Commissioning justice Truth commissions and criminal justice, in: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL30/004/2010
參考資料：
Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 128-150.

  　

10

 4/25 主題三、加害者與真相委員會
Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 75-84; 121-144.
紀錄片：長夜將盡中的加害者類型
參考資料：
Leebaw, B. (2011), Judging State-Sponsored violence, Imagining Political Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119-144.		 個人學期報告主題認領與確認

11

 5/2 主題三、加害者與真相委員會
Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 75-84; 121-144.
瓜地馬拉、秘魯與南韓的真相委員會呈現的加害者
參考資料：
Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods and responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/24/42, 2013.
  　

12

 5/9 主題四、加害者與除垢、解職與清洗
Grodsky, B.K. (2010), The Cost of Justice, Norte Dame: University of Norte Dame, 58-74.
David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17-43.
參考資料：
David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 44-92.
  　

13

 5/16 主題四、加害者與除垢、解職與清洗
Grodsky, B.K. (2010), The Cost of Justice, Norte Dame: University of Norte Dame, 58-74.
David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17-43.
參考資料：
David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 44-92.
  　

14

 5/23 主題五、加害者與亞洲的轉型正義之路
陳俊宏（2015）檢視臺灣的轉型正義之路，http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/71/71-05.pdf
王泰升（2017）論台灣的轉型正義：過去、現在與未來之間的對話，
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~tswang/pdf/03-PDF/01-%E8%8F%AF%E6%96%87/03-02-05-%E8%AB%96%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%9A%84%E8%BD%89%E5%9E%8B%E6%AD%A3%E7%BE%A9%EF%BC%88%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B3%95%E5%AD%B8%E9%9B%9C%E8%AA%8C315%E6%9C%9F%EF%BC%89.pdf
高明輝（1995）《情治檔案─一個老調查員的自述》，台北：商周出版社。		 學期報告大綱

15

 5/30 主題五、加害者與亞洲的轉型正義之路
印尼與東帝汶
加害者的再現：《殺人一舉》與《沉默一瞬》紀錄片		  　

16

 6/6 主題五、加害者與亞洲的轉型正義之路
南韓
高誠晚（2019）台灣與韓國轉型正義之比較，收入：民主、文化與認同，翁聖峰、蘇瑞鏘主編，台北：國立臺北教育大學，46-83.
Su-Hoon Lee (1993), Transitional Politics of Korea, 1987-1992: Activation of Civil Society, In Pacific Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), 351-367
Jennifer Lind (2011), Democratization and Stability in East Asia,In International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2 (June 2011), 409-436.
 　

17

 6/13 主題五、加害者與亞洲的轉型正義之路
Hun Joon Kim (2012), Structural determinants of human rights prosecutions after democratic transition In Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 49, No. 2 (march 2012), 305-320.
Elin Skaar (1999), Truth Commissions, Trials: Or Nothing? Policy Options in Democratic Transitions, In Third World Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 6 (Dec., 1999), 1109-1128.
 學期報告初稿

18

 6/20 學期報告初稿  　
五、考評及成績核算方式 Grading
配分項目 Items 次數 Times 配分比率 Percentage 配分標準說明 Grading Description
出席1620%包含上課提問，參與討論及回應同學問題
報告340%三次口頭報告+書面問題討論各佔10% X 3= 30%
期末報告大綱佔10%
期末報告140% 
配分比率加總 100%  
六、授課教師課業輔導時間和聯絡方式 Office Hours And Contact Info
●課業輔導時間 Office Hour
二78；另外可約線上meeting時間。
●聯絡方式 Contact Info
研究室地點 Office：D804 EMAIL：jhchen@scu.edu.tw
聯絡電話 Tel：6232 其他 Others：
七、教學助理聯絡方式 TA’s Contact Info
教學助理姓名 Name 連絡電話 Tel EMAIL 其他 Others
八、建議先修課程 Suggested Prerequisite Course
九、課程其他要求 Other Requirements
十、學校教材上網、數位學習平台及教師個人網址 University’s Web Portal And Teacher's Website
學校教材上網網址 University’s Teaching Material Portal：
東吳大學Moodle數位平台：http://isee.scu.edu.tw
學校數位學習平台 University’s Digital Learning Platform：
☐東吳大學Moodle數位平台：http://isee.scu.edu.tw
☐東吳大學Tronclass行動數位平台：https://tronclass.scu.edu.tw
教師個人網址 Teacher's Website：
其他 Others：
十一、計畫表公布後異動說明 Changes Made After Posting Syllabus