東吳大學教師授課計劃表

檔案產生時間:2022/3/4 下午 08:05:42
本表如有異動,於4小時內自動更新
一、課程基本資料 Course Information
科目名稱 Course Title:
(中文)美國憲法H組
(英文)AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
開課學期 Semester:110學年度第2學期
開課班級 Class:法四D
授課教師 Instructor:宮文祥 KUNG, WEN-HSIANG
科目代碼 Course Code:BLW40508 單全學期 Semester/Year:全 分組組別 Section:H組
人數限制 Class Size:45 必選修別 Required/Elective:必 學分數 Credit(s):2
星期節次 Day/Session: 二56  前次異動時間 Time Last Edited:111年01月10日22時45分
法律學系基本能力指標 Basic Ability Index
編號
Code
指標名稱
Basic Ability Index
本科目對應之指標
Correspondent Index
達成該項基本能力之考評方式
Methods Of Evaluating This Ability
1具備基礎法學相關基本知識與能力
Equipped with the Ability and Knowledge of Comparative Legal Study.
  
2具備有效處理法律問題基本知識與能力
Equipped with the Advanced Knowledge and Ability of Resolving Legal Issues with Efficiency.
  
3具備瞭解參與兩岸及國際事務能力
Equipped with the Ability of Participating in the Cross-Strait and International Affairs.
  
4具備民主素養專業倫理與人道關懷能力
Equipped with Democratic Literacy, Professional Ethic, and the Capability of Humanistic Care.
  
5具備瞭解參與國家政策規劃基本能力
Equipped with the Ability of Understanding and Participating in the Planning of Government Policy.
  
6具備法學英文閱讀及寫作基本能力
Equipped with the Basic Ability of Foreign Legal Reading and Writing.
》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》紙筆測驗
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
》團隊參與
》學習綜合表現
7具備跨領域法律基本知識與能力
Equipped with the Ability of Integrating Interdisciplinary Legal Knowledge.
》出缺席狀況
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》紙筆測驗
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
》團隊參與
》學習綜合表現
8具備比較法學基本知識與能力
Equipped with the Ability and Knowledge of Comparative Legal Study.
  
9具備處理進階法律問題專業能力
Equipped with the Professional Ability of Resolving the Advanced Legal Issues.
  
10具備法律邏輯推理與獨立思考能力
Equipped with the Ability of Legal Logic Deduction and Independent Thinking .
  
二、指定教科書及參考資料 Textbooks and Reference
(請修課同學遵守智慧財產權,不得非法影印)
●指定教科書 Required Texts
美國憲法 精選案例(下)。
REFERENCES:
STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN AND JESSE H. CHOPER, THE FIRST AMENDMENT CASE – COMMENTS – QUESTIONS (FOURTH EDITION, 2006).
JESSE H. CHOPER, RICHARD H. FALLON, YALE KAMISAR, AND STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CASES—COMMENTS—QUESTIONS (TENTH EDITION, 2006).
DAVID P. CURRIE, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A PRIMER FOR THE PEOPLE (SECOND EDITION, 2000).

●參考書資料暨網路資源 Reference Books and Online Resources
瀏覽與下載美國最高法院判決:
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/opinions.html
相關評論或資料
http://writ.news.findlaw.com
http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/constitutional.html
http://www.acslaw.org/
http://www.constitution.org
三、教學目標 Objectives
新的學期,將會以上學期所建立的基本瞭解,以及所學到的對於案例分析、論述的研究方式,來進行這一學期的課程學習。這學期將完全著重在個人權利保護,從一開始的平等保護的討論,將研析美國種族歧視、優惠性差別待遇等歷史背景及發展過程,審視大法官們如何處理相關議題。再者,課程將介紹何謂言論自由,論述言論自由的重要性、以及保障言論自由的理論,此外,更將審視美國在言論自由保護上豐富的憲法案例,瞭解法院如何針對不同的言論種類,建構出不同的審查標準與審查密度。再者,將介紹美國憲法上宗教自由的相關案例,講解禁止確立宗教條款以及宗教行使自由條款之發展以及大法官相關之論述。憲法的瞭解,必須從它的制定、在案例中的適用、以及隨著時代不同所反映出不同的價值觀,觀看出這部活的憲法是如何與人民生活、社會發展息息相關。希望同學可以透過這樣研究習慣的養成,除了對於美國憲法除了有更完整的認識外,也能有更精確的掌握。
Following the previous semester, we will continue to study the equal protection clause under the U.S. constitutional law, especially focusing on the affirmative action. And then, this course will further focus on the First Amendment. We will examine freedom of speech, including issues that arise from attempts to prohibit or regulate incitement to violence, fighting words, defamation, racist speech, obscenity, pornography, offensive expression, and commercial speech. We also will discuss special problems that are posed by prior restraints on expression, by the regulation of symbolic acts of communication, and by limitations on the use of such public areas as parks and streets. The remainder of the course will focus on the religion clauses of the First Amendment, including public sponsorship of Christmas displays and Ten Commandments displays, governmental funding programs that include private religious schools, and the application of drug laws to the sacramental use of peyote by Native Americans.
四、課程內容 Course Description
整體敘述 Overall Description
新的一學期,我們將繼續美國憲法暨案例的介紹,尤以憲法基本權為本學期討論的重點。以平等原則適用為例,將會進入種族歧視、性別歧視等議題,尤其在美國種族多樣化下,相關理論更是為人所熱道;再者,言論自由的案例及其論理,甚至為我國大法官在解釋上多有採用。當然,還有關於宗教自由、集會結社自由等,也會在時間許可的情況下,與同學一同探索。
在課程進行上,仍將以案例介紹與討論為主。將要求學生進行分組,以負責案例的報告,包括案例的事實背景、爭點所在、正反的論述以及法院最後的裁判。透過這樣的學習,能了解到美國憲法的實際運用。再者,課程將會訓練同學以比較法的方式,審視我國憲法上的相關問題與爭議。除此之外,鑒於英美法的學習,本課程將要求與課學生針對分組報告之案例,繳交以英文寫作之案例摘要,以供成績評量。最後並將於學期末舉行期末考,以檢視學生學習之成果。
●分週敘述 Weekly Schedule
週次 Wk 日期 Date 課程內容 Content 備註 Note

1

2/22 平等保護:reviewing the cases of Dred Scott and Plessy
影片觀賞:正義第九講 - 積極平權
  

2

3/1 Affirmative Action
Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).

Racial Classification
The Intent Requirement
Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
  

3

3/8 Affirmative Action
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 570 U.S. __ (2013). (06/24/2013).
FISHER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ET AL., 579 U.S. ___ (June 23, 2016).
  

4

3/15 Gender
FIRST AMENDMENT
Introduction to the First Amendment
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. __ (2011).
  

5

3/22 Themes in the First Amendment
(Categorization, the Role of the Gov., the Models of Democracy)
Truth theory & Democracy theory & Self-Fulfillment theory & Sociological theory

Regulation of Subversive Speech
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919).
Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
  

6

3/29 Regulation of Subversive Speech
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 44 (1951).
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
  

7

4/5 放假   

8

4/12 Libel & Invasion of Privacy
N.Y. Time v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
Gertz v. Welch, 418 U.S. 323 (1974).
Fighting Words
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
Hostile Audience
Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951).
  

9

4/19 Offensive Words
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).
期中考週

10

4/26 Obscenity
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Salon, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
  

11

5/3 Offensive, Non-obscene Speech
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, 475 U.S. 41 (1986).
Commercial Speech
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976).
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001).
  

12

5/10 Hate Speech
Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).
Right to Silence
Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977).
Speech in Exchange for Gov. Benefits
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991).
United States v. American library Association, Inc., 539 U.S. 194 (2003).
  

13

5/17 TPM Restriction on a Public Forum
Chicago Police Department v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972).
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000).
New Forums
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992).
  

14

5/24 Symbolic Speech
United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).
Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288 (1984).
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000).

Political Speech
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 96 (1976).
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
Review of:
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. __ (2011).
U.S. v. Steven, 559 U.S. __ (2010).
  

15

5/31 Right of Association
Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984).
Freedom of Religion
Walz v. Tax Comm’n, 397 U.S. 664 (1970).
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).
Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000).
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 122 (2002).
  

16

6/7 Free Exercise Clause
Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989).
Accommodation of Religion
Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).
Locke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (2004).
  

17

6/14 Final Exam 期末考

18

6/21 彈性上課   
五、考評及成績核算方式 Grading
配分項目 Items 次數 Times 配分比率 Percentage 配分標準說明 Grading Description
學期考 45% 
分組作業 45% 
出席與上課表現 10% 
配分比率加總 100%  
六、授課教師課業輔導時間和聯絡方式 Office Hours And Contact Info
●課業輔導時間 Office Hour
(二)7、8
●聯絡方式 Contact Info
研究室地點 Office:4422 EMAIL:wkung@alumnil.iu.edu
聯絡電話 Tel:2311-1531 # 3907 其他 Others:
七、教學助理聯絡方式 TA’s Contact Info
教學助理姓名 Name 連絡電話 Tel EMAIL 其他 Others
八、建議先修課程 Suggested Prerequisite Course
九、課程其他要求 Other Requirements
十、學校教材上網、數位學習平台及教師個人網址 University’s Web Portal And Teacher's Website
學校教材上網網址 University’s Teaching Material Portal:
東吳大學Moodle數位平台:http://isee.scu.edu.tw
學校數位學習平台 University’s Digital Learning Platform:
☑東吳大學Moodle數位平台:http://isee.scu.edu.tw
☐東吳大學Tronclass行動數位平台:https://tronclass.scu.edu.tw
教師個人網址 Teacher's Website:
其他 Others:
十一、計畫表公布後異動說明 Changes Made After Posting Syllabus