一、課程基本資料 Course Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
科目名稱 Course Title: (中文)推理、推論與謬誤 (英文)REASONING, INFERENCE, AND FALLACIES |
開課學期 Semester:110學年度第2學期 開課班級 Class:推理 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
授課教師 Instructor:林璿之 LIN, HSUAN-CHIH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
科目代碼 Course Code:BHS11501 | 單全學期 Semester/Year:單 | 分組組別 Section: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
人數限制 Class Size:50 | 必選修別 Required/Elective:選 | 學分數 Credit(s):2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
星期節次 Day/Session: 三34 | 前次異動時間 Time Last Edited:111年03月04日22時23分 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
二、指定教科書及參考資料 Textbooks and Reference (請修課同學遵守智慧財產權,不得非法影印) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
●指定教科書 Required Texts 1. Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press. 2. Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. MIT Press. 3. MacFarlane, (2004). "In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought? Draft of April 21, 2004 For presentation at the Central Division APA 2004. 4. Field, H. (2009). "What is the Normative Role of Logic?", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 83(1): 251–268. 5. Harman, G. (2009). "Field on the Normative Role of Logic", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 109: 333–335. 6. Broome, J., 2000. "Normative Requirements", in J. Dancy, Editor, Normativity, Oxford University Press. ●參考書資料暨網路資源 Reference Books and Online Resources 1.Stalnaker, R. (1984) Inquiry. MIT Press. 2. Walton, D. (1989) Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press. 3. Steinberger, F. "The Normative Status of Logic", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL= | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
三、教學目標 Objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
什麼是一個好的推理與推論?什麼樣的推論犯了什麼謬誤?謬誤的種類有哪些?一般而言,我們會認為符合「邏輯」的才是一個好的推論,所有的謬誤推論都是不符合邏輯的推論。但是,邏輯是關於句子或命題之間的關係,而推論是形成信念或修改信念的一種心理過程。所以我們會面臨一個問題:在什麼意義下,邏輯會規範什麼是正確的推論? 在這堂課中,我們將探討幾個對於邏輯規範推論的經典反例,並嘗試提供一個區分推論好壞的判準。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What counts as a good reasoning or a good inference? What kind of fallacies are involved in a problematic reasoning? How should we distinguish different kinds of fallacies? In general, we tend to think that if an inference is in accordance with logic rules, it is a good inference. Problematic inferences are those which violate logic rules. However, logic is about the relation between sentences or propositions and inference is about how we revise beliefs and form new beliefs. Thus, we cannot avoid the following question: In what sense, logic is normative for reasoning or inference? In this course, we shall investigate several classic examples against the view that logic is normative for inference and try to provide a criterion which distinguishes good inferences from others. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
四、課程內容 Course Description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
●整體敘述 Overall Description 修課學生會被預期每週閱讀關於當代討論謬誤與推論的書籍或相關的一篇文章並在上課時進行討論,本課程將會有三次考試。 |
●分週敘述 Weekly Schedule
|
五、考評及成績核算方式 Grading | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
六、授課教師課業輔導時間和聯絡方式 Office Hours And Contact Info | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
●課業輔導時間 Office Hour 週一 10:00-12:00或 週四 11:00-12:00,請先來信預約。 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
●聯絡方式 Contact Info
|
七、教學助理聯絡方式 TA’s Contact Info | |||||
| |||||
八、建議先修課程 Suggested Prerequisite Course | |||||
九、課程其他要求 Other Requirements | |||||
十、學校教材上網、數位學習平台及教師個人網址 University’s Web Portal And Teacher's Website | |||||
學校教材上網網址 University’s Teaching Material Portal: 東吳大學Moodle數位平台:http://isee.scu.edu.tw |
|||||
學校數位學習平台 University’s Digital Learning Platform: ☐東吳大學Moodle數位平台:http://isee.scu.edu.tw ☐東吳大學Tronclass行動數位平台:https://tronclass.scu.edu.tw | |||||
教師個人網址 Teacher's Website: | |||||
其他 Others: | |||||
十一、計畫表公布後異動說明 Changes Made After Posting Syllabus | |||||
因為5/11受邀演講,所以與5/18的考試調換時間。 |